Technical Difficulties
We apologize folks, for some reason the comment feature isn’t working right now. I’ll be looking into this as soon as I can. Many apologies.
Sponsors
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Hugh McCann on Answering John MacArthur on the Ending of Mark
- 'JT' John Tancock on Follow Up to the James White–Jack Moorman KJV Debate
- James Snapp, Jr. on Answering John MacArthur on the Ending of Mark
- Chuck Wiese on A Clear Exposition of Psalm 12 as a Whole
- James Snapp, Jr. on Change 8 Verses and get a Gay Bible
Categories
Archives
Subscribe
Suggest
Have a suggestion? See an article that we should blog about? Have a website to recommend for our blogroll or recommended links? We welcome feedback, click here to contact us.Blogroll
- Alpha & Omega Ministries
- Better Bibles
- Captain Headknowledge
- Center for the Study of NT Manuscripts
- Cross Focused Reviews
- ESV Bible Blog
- Evangelical Textual Criticism Blog
- Fundamentally Reformed
- Hip & Thigh
- OT Studies Blog
- Pastoral Musings
- Phil's Mind Map
- Polycarp
- Re-Fundamentals
- Reforming Baptist
- Sharper Iron
- The Amsterdam NT Weblog
- Unbounded Words
- Unorthodox Faith
Oh no! I guess if this get’s through, we can all relax and get back to our regularly scheduled emotionally-charged debate.
Too funny, Gary….
I guess if my comments are still there, its not spam! (*sniff*) I’m loved after all…
[shuffles feet awkwardly]
Nazaroo
Sorry for all the spam, I am working through fixing the comments and the spam filter was turned off for a few hours.
When the comments are working again, it might be interesting to have a post on the new SBL Greek New Testament that was released this week. I personally feel that it provides no value, but I’d like to read other’s opinions.
Do you have a link on that Andrew? I know I’m supposed to be up on this, but I have my fingers in a lot of different things lately and hadn’t heard. Thanks!
Bob -
I posted several useful links earlier today and now they are gone. Did you delete those or did they disapear?
More than three links in a post sends it to the moderation queue. I hadn’t seen it yet as it actually got taken as spam (maybe because you didn’t introduce the links or something). Thanks for letting me know. I restored the post.
http://sblgnt.com/
http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/2010/10/sbl-and-logos-bible-software-announce.html
http://www.supakoo.com/rick/ricoblog/2010/10/29/OnTheSBLGreekNewTestamentSBLGNT.aspx
http://bibleworks.oldinthenew.org/
The critical aparatus compares readings from: Westcott/Hort, Tregelles, NIV (Readers GNT), and Robinson/Pierpont.
Agreements Disagreements
SBL—WH: 6,049 879
SBL—Treg: 5,701 1,227
SBL—NIV: 6,312 616
SBL—RP: 969 5,959
Bob,
I provided a list of special readings (i.e., readings adopted by Holmes that were not adopted by any of his four main editions of the GNT used for his apparatus-notes) in the SBLGNT at the textualcriticism discussion-list.
Yours in Christ,
James Snapp, Jr.
James,
Many people who are pro-Byz or pro-TR have been banned from participating in Willker’s Yahoo Group, for being outspoken or not towing the party line re: variants and other politics.
So those people are not likely to return to the Textual Criticism List run by W.W.
It might be better to provide direct links for visitors here.
yours in Christ
Nazaroo